Student AI literacy through structured use

Build judgment, not dependency.

Learners begin with their own thinking, interrogate AI output, compare alternatives, and leave with a clearer final judgment.

A visual workbench with interface panels, colored notes, and comparison charts.
Activity arc Critique. Compare. Reflect. Revise.

Activity studio

A structured AI response audit

Use the panels in order. The goal is not to make AI disappear; the goal is to make your judgment visible.

Set the task

Choose or write a question

Pick a class-ready question, then adjust it until it sounds like something you would genuinely answer.

1. Think first

Start with your own answer

Capture your first claim, your support, and the place where your confidence thins out.

2. Prompt deliberately

Build the AI request

The prompt asks AI to support your thinking process, not to replace it.


                  
                
3. Critique the output

Paste, label, and question the AI response

Use the labels to name what the response does well, where it weakens, and what still needs checking.

4. Compare responses

Score the usefulness of what AI produced

Ratings are not about liking the answer. They are about deciding what deserves trust, revision, or rejection.

3.0 Developing judgment
5. Reflect and revise

Write the improved answer

Keep at least one idea from your original response, then explain what you accepted, changed, or rejected from AI.

Ready to submit

AI Use Note

This summary makes the learner's process visible for a teacher, peer reviewer, or future self.